Monday, March 12, 2012

Module 1 Blog Topic Assignment - David J.Miller

Siemens's Metaphors of Educators
Critique Siemens’s “metaphors of educators.” Which of these metaphors best describes the role you believe an instructor should take in a digital classroom or workplace? Is there a better metaphor to reflect your view of the role of instructors?

Siemens (2008) notes that access to information is steadily increasing as learners choose to embrace technology. The role of the educator and learner is evolving as both are faced to adapt to these changes. Siemens (2008), offers four models or “metaphors of educators” which distinctly express the role of the educator and learner to address these changes.

John Seely Brown (2006) describes learning as “enculturation into a practice.” The most relevant attribute of this model is that student learning is not limited to the expertise of the instructor.

All of the students can learn from each other and their participation and sharing with other class members is imperative for its success. The educator is considered the “master artist” (Siemens, 2008), while the students are developing artists who can create their own original and innovative pieces. In my opinion, this model would work best with content that encourages divergent thought. 

For example, I might see this theory work best in an English class or an Art class where the learner is invited to gather information and then present an independent project that demonstrates the learning content in an individual way. In a subjective class, such as math or science, the demonstration of mathematical or scientific concepts might not lend itself as well to this model.

Clarence Fisher (n.d.), emphasizes the use of learning networks and building connections to assist students in satisfying objectives for a particular course of study (Siemens, 2008). Instructors would give the students the responsibility to find and make connections, and then evaluate them to be sure there is quality interactions and conceptual understanding. In this technological changing learning environment, students can research, seek and sort out their own information and strive to make connections among their findings. I think this model lends itself to many disciplines. Regardless of the topic, information is readily available, but must be sifted through to determine its reliability and relevance. 

This video best illustrates this concept
and can be linked here: http://youtu.be/XwM4ieFOotA

An entry on Stephen Downe’s (2007) blog posted his opinion on the meaning of connectivism.

http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html

In this post, he describes the pedagogy of connectivism as a model that seeks to access networks which are characterized as diverse, autonomous, open and connected (2007).

The third model, presented by Curtis Bank (2007), speaks about the educator as the concierge or the person who points the learner into the right direction. Too often, students can get lost or distracted in the quest for knowledge and may need assistance in sorting through what should be the focus. This model includes time for teacher led instruction and student led discoveries. It may be the balance that students need to help guide them.

The fourth model, educator as a curator, presented by Siemens (2008), suggests that educators must have a dual role of experts and guides. The expert must be competent in his field and be able to guide the learner independently to discover and explore their learning. This model makes the most sense to me as an educator. Too often students find discovery and exploration overwhelming and difficult. Instructors should be prepared and patient to anticipate students needs yet direct those who request assistance.

Which of these metaphors best describes the role you believe an instructor should take in a digital classroom or workplace?

The metaphor that best describes the role an instructor should take into the digital classroom is the educator as the curator. In my opinion, the students in today’s society desire to be in the presence of educated and expert people who can assist them and coach them to make effective use of the changing technological opportunities.


References:


Downes, S. (2007, February). Half and Hour. What Connectivism is?
Retrieved from
http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html

Siemens, G. (2008, January 27). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles
for educators and designers. Paper Presented to ITFORUM. Retrieved from
http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/Paper105/Siemens.pdf


4 comments:

  1. Regarding Brown's model of "enculturation into a practice":

    I really like instilling in my students this idea that they can contribute insights, knowledge, and experience to the class, which may very well be outside the expertise of the teacher or the other students in the class. I teach college mathematics, which does require a great deal direct instruction when teaching content and algorithms. However, when it comes to applying this learning to real world problems, divergent may (and often should) be encouraged. For example, after teaching my students about key components of various curves, I may break the students up into groups and give them the open-ended task to "find, measure, and describe a curve" outside of the classroom. Each group will likely interpret the various elements of the task different and will thus come back with different data and interpretations than other groups. Encouraging divergent, and creative problem solving in any subjects is a great way to engage students and to help them to see that there are lots of ways to approach and solve a given problem or task.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Steven, I concur with the concept of student contributions to the classroom domain; many interesting and informative ideas, projects and productive energy comes from an open forum; seems engagement is becoming more of a challenge with the distractions of technology devices and diversions from actual conversations; good news is that a quick scan of the net allows for a different type of engagement.
    Thanks for the response.

    David

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with the educator functioning as a curator. I think that is the best roloe for educators in the digital era we live in. I also liked the example that you gave about the master artist being a role suited for an English or Art teacher. I liked that you thought specifically about the subject area and how the role would best fit their individual expertise. Good post.

    ReplyDelete
  4. David,
    You bring up a great point about students needing to be in the presence of experts. As the experts I think that we would also have to immerse ourselves in the presence of other experts so that we can have access to more answers. As teachers/instructors we don't always do that so well, something to get used to, I suppose.

    Tom

    ReplyDelete